LATEST UPDATE ON PENSIONS. by Paul Housego December 2011
Usually I write a piece about something that has just happened - a new case that has implications for the industry, or a current issue. This one is, for many readers, about something that is years ahead. But don't stop reading, for it is important and this issue may need a lot of planning - it won't do to let it creep up on you. It is pensions. The Government doesn't want to have to pay income support to people of pension age. It has decided to make everyone have a pension policy. Of course, inertia being what it is, individuals wouldn't get around to it or would decide not to bother even if there are laws that require it, and enforcement would just not work. The obvious answer is to make the employer do it, and that is what is going to happen.
Any one between 22 and state pension age (which will vary over time) must be enrolled into a pension scheme, and - here is the expensive bit - the employer must make contributions to the scheme. Agency workers will also come within the rules. "How much?" you will immediately be asking. It is not an entirely simple answer. 1% rising to 2% rising to 3% of salary, but not counting the first £5715 pa. Your next thought will be "What about the employee?" Most people do not do anything. Therefore the Government has decided that unless you opt out, you are in. If the employee does not opt out, the employer will deduct and pay in contributions starting at 1% rising to 3% then 5%.
The result is that when the phasing is over, an employee who does nothing will have a pension fund receiving contributions of 8% of salary (above the threshold).
But isn't this an administrative nightmare, you may be thinking? Possibly. But there are choices - there will be the option to run your own scheme (and if you do your provider will probably do all the work), or you may already have one which will need amending, or there will be the National Employment Savings Trust, doubtless so named so that it will carry the acronym "Nest". Its website went live on 11th October and is at: http://www.nestpensions.org.uk/schemeweb/NestWeb/public/home/contents/homepage.html
When do you have to do this? If you are a big employer, by October 2012. All employers, no matter how small, will have to have this in place by February 2016. It is possible there may be some slippage on this - one of the intermediate steps has recently been deferred by a year - but it will happen.
And your last thought - what happens if I don't get round to it? The maximum fine the Pensions Regulator can impose is £10,000 a day. (That is not a typo!)
This short piece can be no more than a "heads up" - every company really ought to start planning how to organise this - and consider how it is to be paid for - right now.The government website has some information, and will be worth checking from time to time.
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Pensionsandretirementplanning/Companyandpersonalpensions/DG_183783
What are the rights of employees when their company is sold or they are transferred?
By Caroline Mitchell employment lawyer at Beers LLP
The current industrial action by public sector employees aims to protect the already excellent terms and conditions of employment which they currently enjoy. In many cases these are far better than those enjoyed by the private sector.
The outsourcing of many public sector functions to the private sector over the past decade is set to continue under the current economic climate. The law under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 ensures that the contractual rights of employees in a business that is sold or transferred are continued and protected in the new business. This also applies when there is a service provision change.
This means that, when public sector employees transfer to the private sector during an outsourcing process, they still enjoy the same terms and conditions and more importantly, any collective agreements which they benefited from when they were with the public sector.
Collective agreements are negotiated by unions and apply across the board to all employees in the relevant sector. But what happens after the transfer? Do collective agreements still apply? What if the agreement is re negotiated after a couple of years? Does the new private sector employer find itself bound by union agreements which it had no opportunity to negotiate?
The answer is currently uncertain. A case has been marching through the hierarchy of English Court involving a number of employees, whose terms and conditions were negotiated with the National Joint Council for Local Government Services. Their contracts provided that their terms and conditions were set by the NJC.
The Employment Appeal tribunal decided that a collective agreement will continue to bind the new employer even after it has been renegotiated and a new agreement created. This is called the "Dynamic Position" and links future pay increases to negotiations conducted in the collective bargaining forum.
The Court of Appeal disagreed, it favoured the "Static Interpretation" which sets a limit on the impact of a collective agreement so that the employer is only bound by the agreement which was in force at the time of the transfer.
The case went to the Supreme Court on the 15th June 2011 which sent the matter to the European Court of Justice for their ruling. We wait for their decision but until that happens, the Static Interpretation prevails.
Contact Caroline Mitchell at caroline.mitchell@beersllp.com or 01752 246012